Arvind Kejriwal LIVE Updates 2024
Arvind Kejriwal LIVE Updates 2024:-The Supreme Court will hear on Wednesday the petition filed by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal seeking his release from jail in the Delhi Excise Policy case. The top court will also hear Kejriwal’s plea against the Delhi High Court order upholding his arrest by the CBI in a corruption case related to the alleged excise policy scam. A bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuiyan will hear two petitions of Kejriwal. ALSO READ:-https://livendtv.com/delhi-high-court-update-2024/
Earlier on August 5, the Delhi High Court had ruled that Kejriwal’s arrest was neither illegal nor without any reasonable grounds, as the CBI had presented sufficient evidence to warrant his arrest and remand. The Court further said that Kejriwal is not an ordinary citizen but a distinguished recipient of the Magsaysay Award and convenor of the Aam Aadmi Party.
“Furthermore, it establishes that the circle of evidence against the petitioner was closed following the collection of relevant evidence after his arrest No malice of any kind can be found from the actions of the respondent (CBI)…It is an imperative duty of every court, especially the courts of first instance, to ensure that the extraordinary powers of arrest and remand are not misused or resorted to recklessly and negligently by the police,” the High Court remarked.
Was Kejriwal, who was arrested by ED on March 21, got bail from the trial court on June 20 in the money laundering case. However, the High Court had stayed the trial court’s order. On July 12, the Supreme Court granted him interim bail in the money laundering case.
In his petition, filed two days after the apex court granted bail to former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia in related investigations by the CBI and ED, Kejriwal challenged his arrest and subsequent remand orders, and also pressed for bail. ALSO READ:-https://livendtv.com/delhi-high-court-update-2024/
Kejriwal’s petition relied heavily on the judgment in the Sisodia case, arguing that the same grounds on which the court had deemed fit to release Sisodia on bail should be applicable to him as well. The petition highlights the observations of the apex court in the Sisodia case that prolonged detention in jail without trial can be a violation of fundamental rights, especially when the investigation has been substantially completed and the accused has a social status. It should have deep roots, so that the risk of it absconding is reduced.
Arvind Kejriwal Live Updates 2024 On August 5, the Delhi High Court ruled that Kejriwal’s arrest was neither illegal nor without reasonable grounds, as the CBI had produced “sufficient evidence” to justify his arrest and remand. . The Court further said that Kejriwal is not an ordinary citizen but a distinguished recipient of the Magsaysay Award and convenor of the Aam Aadmi Party.
“Furthermore, it establishes that the circle of evidence against the petitioner was closed following the collection of relevant evidence after his arrest No malice of any kind can be found from the actions of the respondent (CBI)…It is an imperative duty of every court, especially the courts of first instance, to ensure that the extraordinary powers of arrest and remand are not misused or resorted to recklessly and negligently by the police,” the High Court remarked. Was. ALSO READ:-https://livendtv.com/delhi-high-court-update-2024/
Arvind Kejriwal Live Updates 2024 In his petition filed two days after the apex court granted bail to former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia in related investigations by CBI and ED, Kejriwal challenged his arrest and subsequent remand orders, as well as Also pressed for bail.
Kejriwal’s petition relied heavily on the judgment in the Sisodia case, arguing that the same grounds on which the court had deemed fit to release Sisodia on bail should be applicable to him as well. The petition highlights the observations of the apex court in the Sisodia case that prolonged detention in jail without trial can be a violation of fundamental rights, especially when the investigation has been substantially completed and the accused has a social status. It should have deep roots, so that the risk of it absconding is reduced.
