Defending the illegality and political motivation of the summonses, Arvind Kejriwal has been ignoring them. Arvind Kejriwal, the chief minister of Delhi, appeared before a court in the nation’s capital on Saturday regarding the Enforcement Directorate summons case.
He was eventually granted bail by the city’s Rouse Avenue Court in the agency’s case for not responding to its summonses. Kejriwal made his first in-person court appearance in relation to the case at this time. He used video conference to attend at the previous hearing.Kejriwal has been the subject of two complaints from the Enforcement Directorate for allegedly ignoring their requests to participate in the investigation of the Delhi excise policy issue.
In an ED summons case, Arvind Kejriwal shows himself in person before a Delhi court and is granted bail.Kejriwal has been the subject of two complaints from the Enforcement Directorate for allegedly ignoring their requests to participate in the investigation of the Delhi excise policy issue. It seeks to record Arvind Kejriwal’s remarks on matters such as policy formulation, pre-finalization meetings, and bribery claims.
Kejriwal, meanwhile, has been ignoring the summonses, claiming they are unlawful and politically driven.“Arvind Kejriwal was ordered by the court to provide a ₹50,000 bond and surety bond. After providing both bonds, Kejriwal was given permission to go. Advocate Ramesh Gupta told ANI, “After that, we moved an application for supply of copies under sections 207 and 91 CrPC, for which reply and arguments – the date is fixed for April 1.”
According to BJP MP Manoj Tiwari, Arvind Kejriwal needs to abide with the law.”In the event that the ED files complaints, he has been granted bail on a ₹15,000 bail bond. The court has ordered him to observe the law and reply to the ED summons while he is out on bail. A person who has taken the oath of allegiance to the Constitution should obey the law,” he continued.
According to AAP leader Reena Gupta, there isn’t any proof against Kejriwal.”We have maintained from the beginning that this is an unfounded complaint and a political vendetta. There isn’t any evidence,” the woman declared.
ALSO READ:- Cuisine of Uttarakhand: 16 Delectable Recipes You Must Taste While Traveling
The judge declined to suspend the summonses on Friday. Kejriwal had maintained that he had never disobeyed on purpose and that he had always given valid explanations for his absences.
Kejriwal made a virtual appearance on February 17. Following the Enforcement Directorate’s second complaint, the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate last Thursday summoned Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal again for a court appearance on March 16.
Under Section 190 (1)(a) CrPC r/w Section 200 CrPC 1973 r/w Section 174 IPC, 1860 r/w Section 63 (4) of PMLA, 2002, Kejriwal was the subject of a second complaint for non-attendance in violation of Section 50 of the PMLA, 2002.
ALSO READ:- A 70-year-old Korean woman who had gone missing was discovered in Delhi a month later.
Charges made against AAP officials
As of right moment, the Delhi excise policy case has six charge sheets filed. The AAP leader Sanjay Singh and his assistant Sarvesh Mishra were named by the ED in its sixth charge sheet, which also stated that the AAP utilized ₹45 crore in bribes obtained under the policy to support its campaign for the Goa assembly elections in 2022.
Manish Sisodia, the AAP leader, and Sanjay Singh are both incarcerated on comparable counts. The party asserts that Arvind Kejriwal cannot run for Lok Sabha elections until the Centre orders the ED to arrest him.
Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me. https://www.binance.com/en-NG/register?ref=JHQQKNKN